How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. WF-C700N vs REAL Blue TWS 3

Sony WF-C700N vs Teufel REAL Blue TWS 3

What WF-C700N does better (3) and where REAL Blue TWS 3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Sony WF-C700N
Sony · 2023WF-C700N
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ $100
vs
Teufel REAL Blue TWS 3
Teufel · 2024REAL Blue TWS 3
7.4Score
3 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
6.3Battery5.7

Why is WF-C700N better than REAL Blue TWS 3?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 9 h+11%
  2. Battery life with ANC7 h vs 5 h+40%
  3. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is REAL Blue TWS 3 better than WF-C700N?

  1. Total with charging case20 h vs 37 h+85%
  2. Driver size5 mm vs 12 mm2.4×
  3. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
Specifications

Side by side

Sony WF-C700NSony WF-C700N≈ $1006.9
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size5 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz10 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h9 h
Battery life with ANC7 h5 h
Total with charging case20 h37 h
Battery capacity—45 mAh
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.6 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare