vs
9.3Noise control & calls7.2
Why is Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400 better than WF-C700N?
Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is WF-C700N better than Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400?
WF-C700N has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 5 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 20 h |
| Battery capacity | 60 mAh | — |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Bixby | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.6 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Soundcore Liberty 4 NCvsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400
vsHuawei FreeClipvsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400
vsTechnics EAH-AZ40M2vsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vsJBL TOUR Pro 2
vsJBL Live FlexvsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vsNoble Audio FALCON MAX