vs
7.7Sound8.0
7.8Noise control & calls7.8
Why is AONIC 50 GEN 2 better than WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo?
- Battery life45 h vs 40 h+12%
- aptXYes · WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo: No
- Driver size50 mm vs 30 mm+67%
Why is WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo better than AONIC 50 GEN 2?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 4 Hz5×
- Weight334 g vs 250 g+34%
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+82%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 50 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 39 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 45 h | 40 h |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 334 g | 250 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Shure AONIC 50 GEN 2vsBose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones
vsSennheiser HD 660S2vsShure AONIC 50 GEN 2vs
Shure AONIC 50 GEN 2vsAudeze MM-100
vsShure Aionic 50 Gen 2vsShure AONIC 50 GEN 2
vsHifiMan Ananda NanovsShure AONIC 50 GEN 2vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra HeadphonesvsSony WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo