How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. MM-100 vs AONIC 50 GEN 2

Audeze MM-100 vs Shure AONIC 50 GEN 2

What MM-100 does better (2) and where AONIC 50 GEN 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Audeze MM-100
Audeze · 2023MM-100
2 advantages≈ $450
vs
Shure AONIC 50 GEN 2
Shure · 2023AONIC 50 GEN 2
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $340
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls7.8

Why is MM-100 better than AONIC 50 GEN 2?

  1. Driver size90 mm vs 50 mm+80%
  2. Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+14%

Why is AONIC 50 GEN 2 better than MM-100?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · MM-100: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typePlanar magneticDynamic
Driver size90 mm50 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency25,000 Hz22,000 Hz
Impedance18 Ω39 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB98 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—45 h
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight—334 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare