vs
7.9Noise control & calls4.0
Why is AONIC 50 GEN 2 better than Luan?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Luan: No
- Weight334 g vs 354 g+6%
Why is Luan better than AONIC 50 GEN 2?
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+82%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 50 mm | 50 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 39 Ω | 38 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 45 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 334 g | 354 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
