Why is Aonic 40 better than ULT Wear?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · ULT Wear: No
- aptXYes · ULT Wear: No
Why is ULT Wear better than Aonic 40?
- Battery life25 h vs 50 h2×
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
- Weight319 g vs 255 g+25%
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 31 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 110 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 25 h | 50 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 30 h |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 319 g | 255 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
