How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Porta Pro Wireless 2.0 vs ULT Wear

Koss Porta Pro Wireless 2.0 vs Sony ULT Wear

What Porta Pro Wireless 2.0 does better (2) and where ULT Wear wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Koss Porta Pro Wireless 2.0
2 advantages≈ $95
vs
Sony ULT Wear
Sony · 2024ULT Wear
6.3Score
3 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls7.8

Why is Porta Pro Wireless 2.0 better than ULT Wear?

  1. Weight60 g vs 255 g4.2×
  2. Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+25%

Why is ULT Wear better than Porta Pro Wireless 2.0?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 50 h2.5×
  2. Active noise cancellingNo · Porta Pro Wireless 2.0: Yes
  3. Lowest frequency15 Hz vs 5 Hz3×
Specifications

Side by side

Sony ULT WearSony ULT Wear≈ $956.3
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency15 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency25,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance60 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity101 dB110 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h50 h
Battery life with ANC—30 h
Charging time—3.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight60 g255 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare