How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OpenRun vs AQUA

Shokz OpenRun vs Suunto AQUA

What OpenRun does better (1) and where AQUA wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Shokz OpenRun
Shokz · 2025OpenRun
6.6Score
1 advantage≈ $130
vs
Suunto AQUA
Suunto · 2025AQUA
9.0Score
4 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
3.9Battery6.0
8.2Build & features8.8

Why is OpenRun better than AQUA?

  1. Weight26 g vs 35 g+35%

Why is AQUA better than OpenRun?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 10 h+25%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
  3. Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.3+4%
  4. Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Shokz OpenRunShokz OpenRun≈ $1306.6
Suunto AQUASuunto AQUA≈ $2009.0
Sound
FitBone conductionBone conduction
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance8 Ω9 Ω
Sensitivity105 dB120 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h10 h
Battery capacity160 mAh—
Charging time1.5 h1 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
NFC pairing—Yes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Weight26 g35 g
Protection ratingIP67IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx8
Dust protection (IP)66
ColoursBlack, Grey, Blue, Purple, Red—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare