vs
Why is IE 100 Pro Wireless better than Aonic 215 Universal?
- Lowest frequency18 Hz vs 22 Hz+22%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 17,500 Hz+14%
Why is Aonic 215 Universal better than IE 100 Pro Wireless?
Aonic 215 Universal has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Neckband | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 18 Hz | 22 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 17,500 Hz |
| Impedance | 20 Ω | 20 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 115 dB | 107 dB |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 30 g |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
