vs
5.0Battery6.2
Why is CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1 better than h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800?
- aptXYes · h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800: No
- Driver size7 mm vs 6 mm+17%
Why is h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 better than CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1?
- Battery life7 h vs 8 h+14%
- Earbud weight (each)12 g vs 7.6 g+58%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 7 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 21,000 Hz | — |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| NFC pairing | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 12 g | 7.6 g |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1
vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1
vs
Sony WF-XB700vsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1
vs
Technics EAH-AZ70WvsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Apple AirPods ProvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
