vs
9.3Noise control & calls7.2
3.2Battery8.8
Why is Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190 better than WF-1000XM4?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
Why is WF-1000XM4 better than Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190?
- Battery life6 h vs 12 h2×
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 6 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 5 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 7.3 g |
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T5.96.0vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsShure AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A5.95.9vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsSoundcore Liberty Air 2 Pro5.96.2vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsTechnics EAH-AZ70W5.95.6vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsJBL Live Pro+ TWS5.96.0
vs
Sony WF-1000XM5vsSony WF-1000XM47.27.6