vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
3.7Battery6.3
Why is Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530 better than WF-C700N?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Total with charging case30 h vs 20 h+50%
Why is WF-C700N better than Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530?
- Battery life6 h vs 10 h+67%
- Battery life with ANC5 h vs 7 h+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 5 mm |
| Number of drivers | 2 | — |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Head tracking | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 30 h | 20 h |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.6 g |
| Protection rating | IP57 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsTechnics EAH-AZ40M25.96.1vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsYamaha TW-E3C5.96.3vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsHuawei Freebuds 55.96.1vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsradius Hear-scape Beethoven HP-B100BTvs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 2 SM-R1175.96.7
vs
Sony WF-C710NvsSony WF-C700N7.06.9