vs
Why is TAT8505BK/00 better than h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800?
- Driver size13 mm vs 6 mm2.2×
Why is h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 better than TAT8505BK/00?
- Battery life6 h vs 8 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 13 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Sensitivity | 108 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| NFC pairing | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 7.6 g |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Google Pixel Buds A-SeriesvsPhilips TAT8505BK/00vs
Philips TAT8505BK/00vsSony WF-XB700
vs
Apple AirPods ProvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vsApple AirPods (3rd Gen)vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vsApple AirPods 3vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800