How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT3509 vs Push Play Active S2PPW

Philips TAT3509 vs Skullcandy Push Play Active S2PPW

What TAT3509 does better (2) and where Push Play Active S2PPW wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT3509
Philips · 2024TAT3509
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
vs
Skullcandy Push Play Active S2PPW
Skullcandy · 2024Push Play Active S2PPW
2 advantages≈ $40
5.5Build & features7.4

Why is TAT3509 better than Push Play Active S2PPW?

  1. Weight45 g vs 67 g+49%
  2. Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%

Why is Push Play Active S2PPW better than TAT3509?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 10 h+25%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT3509Philips TAT3509≈ $355.9
Sound
FitIn-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω22 Ω
Sensitivity104 dB104 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h10 h
Battery life with ANC6 h—
Total with charging case24 h—
Charging time2 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLC3, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight45 g67 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare