How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Air 2 NC vs TAT3509

EarFun Air 2 NC vs Philips TAT3509

What Air 2 NC does better (4) and where TAT3509 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

EarFun Air 2 NC
EarFun · 2024Air 2 NC
4 advantages
vs
Philips TAT3509
Philips · 2024TAT3509
5.9Score
0 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
8.8Noise control & calls7.2

Why is Air 2 NC better than TAT3509?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TAT3509: No
  2. Total with charging case40 h vs 24 h+67%
  3. LDACYes · TAT3509: No
  4. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is TAT3509 better than Air 2 NC?

TAT3509 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT3509Philips TAT3509≈ $355.9
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—104 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life—8 h
Battery life with ANC—6 h
Total with charging case40 h24 h
Battery capacity40 mAh—
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, SBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Design & build
Weight—45 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare