How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT2236 vs MI True Wireless Earbuds Basic 2

Philips TAT2236 vs Xiaomi MI True Wireless Earbuds Basic 2

What TAT2236 does better (2) and where MI True Wireless Earbuds Basic 2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT2236
Philips · 2021TAT2236
3.7Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi MI True Wireless Earbuds Basic 2
3.6Score
0 advantages≈ $16
3.1Noise control & calls3.1
2.7Battery2.2

Why is TAT2236 better than MI True Wireless Earbuds Basic 2?

  1. Battery life6 h vs 4 h+50%
  2. Total with charging case18 h vs 12 h+50%

Why is MI True Wireless Earbuds Basic 2 better than TAT2236?

MI True Wireless Earbuds Basic 2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT2236Philips TAT2236≈ $253.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size12 mm—
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance28 Ω—
Sensitivity104 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h4 h
Total with charging case18 h12 h
Battery capacity—43 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—4.1 g
Protection ratingIPX4—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare