How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Wave 200TWS vs TAT2236

JBL Wave 200TWS vs Philips TAT2236

What Wave 200TWS does better (1) and where TAT2236 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JBL Wave 200TWS
JBL · 2021Wave 200TWS
3.5Score
1 advantage≈ $30
vs
Philips TAT2236
Philips · 2021TAT2236
3.7Score
3 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
3.1Noise control & calls3.1
2.3Battery2.7

Why is Wave 200TWS better than TAT2236?

  1. Total with charging case20 h vs 18 h+11%

Why is TAT2236 better than Wave 200TWS?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
  2. Battery life5 h vs 6 h+20%
  3. Driver size8 mm vs 12 mm+50%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Wave 200TWSJBL Wave 200TWS≈ $303.5
Philips TAT2236Philips TAT2236≈ $253.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size8 mm12 mm
Number of drivers11
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω28 Ω
Sensitivity—104 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life5 h6 h
Total with charging case20 h18 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)8.7 g—
Protection ratingIPX2IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare