Why is TAQ2000 better than C40i?
- Total with charging case28 h vs 21 h+33%
Why is C40i better than TAQ2000?
- Lowest frequency100 Hz vs 20 Hz5×
- Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 12 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 100 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 22 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 113 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | 21 h |
| Battery capacity | 51 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 5 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 48 g | — |
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5.8 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | — | Midnight Black, Desert Bronze |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
