Why is TAQ2000 better than B3?
- Battery life7 h vs 5.5 h+27%
- Weight48 g vs 50 g+3%
- Driver size12 mm vs 10 mm+20%
Why is B3 better than TAQ2000?
B3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 100 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 113 dB | 98 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 5.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 51 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 48 g | 50 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
