Why is TAQ2000 better than A25i?
- Driver size12 mm vs 6 mm2×
- Battery capacity51 mAh vs 37 mAh+38%
Why is A25i better than TAQ2000?
- Battery life7 h vs 9 h+29%
- Lowest frequency100 Hz vs 20 Hz5×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 100 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 113 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 9 h |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 51 mAh | 37 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 48 g | — |
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
