How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAQ2000 vs Dime Evo

Philips TAQ2000 vs Skullcandy Dime Evo

What TAQ2000 does better (2) and where Dime Evo wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAQ2000
Philips · 2025TAQ2000
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ $40
vs
Skullcandy Dime Evo
Skullcandy · 2025Dime Evo
4.6Score
2 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
3.1Noise control & calls4.8
4.6Battery5.4
4.6Build & features2.8

Why is TAQ2000 better than Dime Evo?

  1. Weight48 g vs 65 g+35%
  2. Driver size12 mm vs 6 mm2×

Why is Dime Evo better than TAQ2000?

  1. Battery life7 h vs 8 h+14%
  2. Lowest frequency100 Hz vs 20 Hz5×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAQ2000Philips TAQ2000≈ $404.4
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency100 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity113 dB104 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h8 h
Total with charging case28 h28 h
Battery capacity51 mAh—
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 2 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight48 g65 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Colours—True Black, Bone, Primer, Preppy Sage
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare