Why is TAQ2000 better than RB-EB220?
- Battery life7 h vs 6 h+17%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5+8%
- Battery capacity51 mAh vs 30 mAh+70%
Why is RB-EB220 better than TAQ2000?
- Active noise cancellingNo · TAQ2000: Yes
- Lowest frequency100 Hz vs 20 Hz5×
- Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
- Driver size12 mm vs 13 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 13 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 100 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 113 dB | 120 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 51 mAh | 30 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 48 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | — | Blue |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
