How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAPH805BK/10 vs Crusher Evo

Philips TAPH805BK/10 vs Skullcandy Crusher Evo

What TAPH805BK/10 does better (4) and where Crusher Evo wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAPH805BK/10
Philips · 2020TAPH805BK/10
6.0Score
4 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Skullcandy · 2020Crusher Evo
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $120
7.8Noise control & calls3.8
4.0Battery5.4

Why is TAPH805BK/10 better than Crusher Evo?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · Crusher Evo: No
  2. Lowest frequency7 Hz vs 20 Hz2.9×
  3. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  4. Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%

Why is Crusher Evo better than TAPH805BK/10?

  1. Battery life30 h vs 40 h+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Fit—Over-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency7 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity90 dB100 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h40 h
Battery life with ANC30 h—
Charging time2 h2.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsSBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—312 g
FoldableYesYes
Colours—True Black, Chill Grey, Primer, Realtree APX Black/Orange, Bone
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare