How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAPH805BK/10 vs HDJ-CUE1BT

Philips TAPH805BK/10 vs Pioneer DJ HDJ-CUE1BT

What TAPH805BK/10 does better (2) and where HDJ-CUE1BT wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAPH805BK/10
Philips · 2020TAPH805BK/10
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Pioneer DJ HDJ-CUE1BT
Pioneer DJ · 2020HDJ-CUE1BT
1 advantage≈ $90
7.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is TAPH805BK/10 better than HDJ-CUE1BT?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · HDJ-CUE1BT: No
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 30,000 Hz+33%

Why is HDJ-CUE1BT better than TAPH805BK/10?

  1. Lowest frequency7 Hz vs 5 Hz+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency7 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz30,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity90 dB104 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h—
Battery life with ANC30 h—
Charging time2 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight—250 g
FoldableYes—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare