How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAK4206 vs Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones

Philips TAK4206 vs Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones

What TAK4206 does better (1) and where Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAK4206
Philips · 2021TAK4206
4.1Score
1 advantage≈ $25
Higher score
vs
Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ $35
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
4.2Battery3.4

Why is TAK4206 better than Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones?

  1. Battery life28 h vs 22 h+27%

Why is Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones better than TAK4206?

  1. Driver size32 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4206Philips TAK4206≈ $254.1
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Driver size32 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω30 Ω
Sensitivity83 dB126 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life28 h22 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
FoldableYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare