Why is TAK4200 better than WH-CH530?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 150 mAh2×
- Weight129 g vs 150 g+16%
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
- Driver size32 mm vs 30 mm+7%
Why is WH-CH530 better than TAK4200?
- Battery life45 h vs 55 h+22%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 32 mm | 30 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 85 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 45 h | 55 h |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 150 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 3 min → 1,5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 129 g | 150 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
