vs
6.0Noise control & calls9.2
Why is WH-CH530 better than TruSound ANC Neckband Earbuds?
- Battery life55 h vs 28 h+96%
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is TruSound ANC Neckband Earbuds better than WH-CH530?
- Active noise cancellingNo · WH-CH530: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 30 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 55 h | 28 h |
| Battery capacity | 150 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 3 min → 1,5 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 150 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Moondrop Space Travel 2vsSony WH-CH530
vs
Sony WH-CH530vsPhilips TAH4500
vs
Sony WH-CH530vsJBL Junior 320C
vs
Soundcore C40i Open-Ear Clip-On Kopfhörer kabellos, GraphitgrauvsVerbatim TruSound ANC Neckband Earbuds
vs
Philips THE RINGO DUOvsVerbatim TruSound ANC Neckband Earbuds
vs
JBL Tune 520BT2vsVerbatim TruSound ANC Neckband Earbuds
