How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAH8000E vs Neo

Philips TAH8000E vs Xiaomi Neo

What TAH8000E does better (3) and where Neo wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAH8000E
Philips · 2026TAH8000E
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Neo
Xiaomi · 2026Neo
0 advantages≈ $55
6.1Noise control & calls3.8

Why is TAH8000E better than Neo?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · Neo: No
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. Battery capacity1,100 mAh vs 600 mAh+83%

Why is Neo better than TAH8000E?

Neo has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi NeoXiaomi Neo≈ $55
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity112 dB42 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones5—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h—
Battery life with ANC50 h—
Battery capacity1,100 mAh600 mAh
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 8 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight260 g—
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare