How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUNE 775NC vs TAH8000E

JBL TUNE 775NC vs Philips TAH8000E

What TUNE 775NC does better (2) and where TAH8000E wins (4) — every spec side by side.

JBL TUNE 775NC
JBL · 2026TUNE 775NC
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH8000E
Philips · 2026TAH8000E
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ $80
7.9Noise control & calls6.4
7.6Battery8.4

Why is TUNE 775NC better than TAH8000E?

  1. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
  2. Weight232 g vs 260 g+12%

Why is TAH8000E better than TUNE 775NC?

  1. Driver size4 mm vs 40 mm10×
  2. Battery capacity70 mAh vs 1,100 mAh15.7×
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  4. Battery life with ANC44 h vs 50 h+14%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL TUNE 775NCJBL TUNE 775NC≈ $808.6
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size4 mm40 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB112 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—5
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h70 h
Battery life with ANC44 h50 h
Battery capacity70 mAh1,100 mAh
Charging time1 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 8 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight232 g260 g
FoldableYesYes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare