How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAH5205WT/00 vs TAK4206

Philips TAH5205WT/00 vs Philips TAK4206

What TAH5205WT/00 does better (2) and where TAK4206 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAH5205WT/00
Philips · 2021TAH5205WT/00
3.8Score
2 advantages≈ $40
vs
Philips TAK4206
Philips · 2021TAK4206
4.1Score
1 advantage≈ $25
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
2.8Battery4.2

Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than TAK4206?

  1. Battery life29 h vs 28 h+4%
  2. Driver size40 mm vs 32 mm+25%

Why is TAK4206 better than TAH5205WT/00?

  1. Charging time3.5 h vs 2 h+75%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4206Philips TAK4206≈ $254.1
Sound
FitOn-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size40 mm32 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity90 dB83 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life29 h28 h
Charging time3.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight210 g—
FoldableYesYes
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare