How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAH3209 vs Grom Wireless

Philips TAH3209 vs Skullcandy Grom Wireless

What TAH3209 does better (1) and where Grom Wireless wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAH3209
Philips · 2024TAH3209
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Skullcandy Grom Wireless
Skullcandy · 2024Grom Wireless
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ $40
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
4.5Battery5.0

Why is TAH3209 better than Grom Wireless?

  1. Charging time2 h vs 4 h2×

Why is Grom Wireless better than TAH3209?

  1. Battery life25 h vs 45 h+80%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH3209Philips TAH3209≈ $254.3
Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity112 dB113 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h45 h
Battery capacity600 mAh—
Charging time2 h4 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight13 g—
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare