How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Junior 320 vs TAH3209

JBL Junior 320 vs Philips TAH3209

What Junior 320 does better (0) and where TAH3209 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Junior 320
JBL · 2024Junior 320
0 advantages≈ $25
vs
Philips TAH3209
Philips · 2024TAH3209
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is Junior 320 better than TAH3209?

Junior 320 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAH3209 better than Junior 320?

  1. Weight117 g vs 13 g9×
  2. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH3209Philips TAH3209≈ $254.2
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size32 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance34 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity78 dB112 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life—25 h
Battery capacity—600 mAh
Charging time3 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Design & build
Weight117 g13 g
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare