Why is TAH3209 better than TAH4209?
- Weight13 g vs 160 g12.3×
Why is TAH4209 better than TAH3209?
- Battery life25 h vs 55 h2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 112 dB | 112 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 25 h | 55 h |
| Battery capacity | 600 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 13 g | 160 g |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
