How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Junior 320 vs TAH4209

JBL Junior 320 vs Philips TAH4209

What Junior 320 does better (1) and where TAH4209 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Junior 320
JBL · 2024Junior 320
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Philips TAH4209
Philips · 2024TAH4209
4.8Score
1 advantage≈ $25
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is Junior 320 better than TAH4209?

  1. Weight117 g vs 160 g+37%

Why is TAH4209 better than Junior 320?

  1. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH4209Philips TAH4209≈ $254.8
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance34 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity78 dB112 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life—55 h
Battery capacity—600 mAh
Charging time3 h2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight117 g160 g
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare