vs
Why is TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80W better than Poseidon R3T?
TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80W has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Poseidon R3T better than TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80W?
- Channel count2 vs 63×
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 160 W | — |
| Speaker channels | 2.0 | 6.0 |
| Channel count | 2 | 6 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 1,930 g | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Placement | an der Wand | an der Wand |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsOakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200Wvs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsEnergy Sistem Soundbar 120Wvs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsSamsung HW-Q600H/XUvs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsSamsung Q800H 5.1.2-Kanal Dolby Atmos Soundbarvs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsJBL Bar 800MK2 7.1-Kanal-Soundbarvs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsJBL Bar 300 MK2 5.0-Kanal-Soundbar, Dolby Atmos, MultiBeam 3.0