vs
2.7Sound3.9
Why is Soundbar 120W better than TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80W?
- Weight1,700 g vs 1,930 g+14%
Why is TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80W better than Soundbar 120W?
- SubwooferNone vs Wireless subwoofer included
- Output power120 W vs 160 W+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 120 W | 160 W |
| Speaker channels | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Channel count | 2 | 2 |
| Subwoofer | None | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Lowest frequency | 50 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | Yes |
| Optical input | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 1,700 g | 1,930 g |
| Width | 530 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Placement | an der Wand | an der Wand |
Related comparisons
vs
Majority Naga 40 PlusvsEnergy Sistem Soundbar 120W
vsOakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200WvsEnergy Sistem Soundbar 120Wvs
Energy Sistem Soundbar 120WvsSamsung HW-Q600H/XU
vsJBL Bar 800MK2 7.1-Kanal-SoundbarvsEnergy Sistem Soundbar 120W
vsPhilips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsOakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200WvsPhilips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsSamsung HW-Q600H/XU