vs
Why is TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80W better than HW-B400F/ZF?
- SubwooferWireless subwoofer included vs None
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 4.2+29%
- Weight1,930 g vs 2,100 g+9%
Why is HW-B400F/ZF better than TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80W?
HW-B400F/ZF has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 160 W | — |
| Speaker channels | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Channel count | 2 | 2 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | None |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 4.2 |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | — |
| Optical input | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 1,930 g | 2,100 g |
| Width | — | 641 mm |
| Height | — | 66 mm |
| Depth | — | 107 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Placement | an der Wand | vor dem Fernseher, an der Wand |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsOakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200W
vs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsEnergy Sistem Soundbar 120W
vs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsSamsung HW-Q600H/XU
vs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsSamsung Q800H 5.1.2-Kanal Dolby Atmos Soundbar
vs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsJBL Bar 800MK2 7.1-Kanal-Soundbar
vs
Philips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsJBL Bar 300 MK2 5.0-Kanal-Soundbar, Dolby Atmos, MultiBeam 3.0

