How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAA4216BK/00 vs WH-CH720N

Philips TAA4216BK/00 vs Sony WH-CH720N

What TAA4216BK/00 does better (2) and where WH-CH720N wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAA4216BK/00
Philips · 2021TAA4216BK/00
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ $50
vs
Sony WH-CH720N
Sony · 2023WH-CH720N
6.6Score
5 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls7.8
5.4Battery5.0

Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than WH-CH720N?

  1. Charging time2 h vs 3.5 h+75%
  2. Driver size40 mm vs 30 mm+33%

Why is WH-CH720N better than TAA4216BK/00?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · TAA4216BK/00: Yes
  2. Battery life35 h vs 50 h+43%
  3. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
  4. Weight214 g vs 192 g+11%
  5. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Sony WH-CH720NSony WH-CH720N≈ $656.6
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω31 Ω
Sensitivity118 dB108 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h50 h
Battery life with ANC—32 h
Charging time2 h3.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.2
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight214 g192 g
Protection ratingIP55—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5—
Dust protection (IP)5—
FoldableYesYes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare