How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BuddyPhones Play vs TAA4216BK/00

Onanoff BuddyPhones Play vs Philips TAA4216BK/00

What BuddyPhones Play does better (1) and where TAA4216BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Onanoff BuddyPhones Play
Onanoff · 2021BuddyPhones Play
1 advantage≈ $50
vs
Philips TAA4216BK/00
Philips · 2021TAA4216BK/00
6.0Score
1 advantage≈ $50
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is BuddyPhones Play better than TAA4216BK/00?

  1. Weight150 g vs 214 g+43%

Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than BuddyPhones Play?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 35 h+75%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity75 dB118 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h35 h
Charging time—2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight150 g214 g
Protection rating—IP55
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
FoldableYesYes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare