How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAA4216BK/00 vs Hesh Evo

Philips TAA4216BK/00 vs Skullcandy Hesh Evo

What TAA4216BK/00 does better (0) and where Hesh Evo wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAA4216BK/00
Philips · 2021TAA4216BK/00
6.0Score
0 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
vs
Skullcandy Hesh Evo
Skullcandy · 2021Hesh Evo
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $45
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
5.4Battery5.0

Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than Hesh Evo?

TAA4216BK/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Hesh Evo better than TAA4216BK/00?

  1. Battery life35 h vs 36 h+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity118 dB91 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h36 h
Charging time2 h—
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight214 g213 g
Protection ratingIP55—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5—
Dust protection (IP)5—
FoldableYesYes
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare