How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAA4216BK/00 vs HD 250 BT

Philips TAA4216BK/00 vs Sennheiser HD 250 BT

What TAA4216BK/00 does better (2) and where HD 250 BT wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAA4216BK/00
Philips · 2021TAA4216BK/00
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
vs
Sennheiser HD 250 BT
Sennheiser · 2020HD 250 BT
3.8Score
2 advantages≈ $60
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
5.4Battery2.9

Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than HD 250 BT?

  1. Battery life35 h vs 25 h+40%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%

Why is HD 250 BT better than TAA4216BK/00?

  1. Weight214 g vs 125 g+71%
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz22,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity118 dB94 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h25 h
Charging time2 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecs—aptX, AAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—Yes
LDAC—No
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight214 g125 g
Protection ratingIP55—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5—
Dust protection (IP)5—
FoldableYes—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare