vs
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
5.4Battery2.8
Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than TAH5205WT/00?
- Battery life35 h vs 29 h+21%
- Charging time2 h vs 3.5 h+75%
Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than TAA4216BK/00?
TAH5205WT/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 118 dB | 90 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 35 h | 29 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 214 g | 210 g |
| Protection rating | IP55 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | White |
