How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAA4216BK/00 vs TAA5608BK/00

Philips TAA4216BK/00 vs Philips TAA5608BK/00

What TAA4216BK/00 does better (4) and where TAA5608BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAA4216BK/00
Philips · 2021TAA4216BK/00
6.0Score
4 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
vs
Philips TAA5608BK/00
Philips · 2023TAA5608BK/00
1 advantage≈ $30
5.4Battery2.4

Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than TAA5608BK/00?

  1. Battery life35 h vs 6 h5.8×
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 130 Hz6.5×
  3. Charging time2 h vs 6 h3×
  4. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 16,000 Hz+25%

Why is TAA5608BK/00 better than TAA4216BK/00?

  1. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earBone conduction
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz130 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz16,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω8 Ω
Sensitivity118 dB88 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNo—
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h6 h
Charging time2 h6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.3
Bluetooth codecs—LC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight214 g—
Protection ratingIP55IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx5
Dust protection (IP)5—
FoldableYes—
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare