How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. SHC5200M2/12 vs Grom Wireless

Philips SHC5200M2/12 vs Skullcandy Grom Wireless

What SHC5200M2/12 does better (4) and where Grom Wireless wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips SHC5200M2/12
Philips · 2025SHC5200M2/12
4.3Score
4 advantages≈ $40
vs
Skullcandy Grom Wireless
Skullcandy · 2024Grom Wireless
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ $40
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
4.6Battery5.0

Why is SHC5200M2/12 better than Grom Wireless?

  1. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
  2. Charging time3 h vs 4 h+33%
  3. Driver size32 mm vs 30 mm+7%
  4. Highest frequency21,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+5%

Why is Grom Wireless better than SHC5200M2/12?

  1. Battery life30 h vs 45 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency10 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency21,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance24 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB113 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h45 h
Battery capacity600 mAh—
Charging time3 h4 h
Quick charge (claimed)15 min → 4 h10 min → 4 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.2
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare