How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HA-S60W vs SHC5200M2/12

JVC HA-S60W vs Philips SHC5200M2/12

What HA-S60W does better (2) and where SHC5200M2/12 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JVC HA-S60W
JVC · 2025HA-S60W
2 advantages≈ $35
vs
Philips SHC5200M2/12
Philips · 2025SHC5200M2/12
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
5.9Battery4.6

Why is HA-S60W better than SHC5200M2/12?

  1. Battery life50 h vs 30 h+67%
  2. Charging time2.5 h vs 3 h+20%

Why is SHC5200M2/12 better than HA-S60W?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
  2. Driver size30 mm vs 32 mm+7%
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 21,000 Hz+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Fit—Over-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size30 mm32 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz10 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz21,000 Hz
Impedance—24 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB96 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h30 h
Battery capacity—600 mAh
Charging time2.5 h3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.4—
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight149 g—
FoldableYes—
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare