How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Fidelio X3 vs WH-XB910N

Philips Fidelio X3 vs Sony WH-XB910N

What Fidelio X3 does better (3) and where WH-XB910N wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips Fidelio X3
Philips · 2020Fidelio X3
3 advantages≈ $200
vs
Sony WH-XB910N
Sony · 2021WH-XB910N
7.2Score
2 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls7.9

Why is Fidelio X3 better than WH-XB910N?

  1. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 25,000 Hz+60%
  2. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 7 Hz+40%
  3. Driver size50 mm vs 40 mm+25%

Why is WH-XB910N better than Fidelio X3?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Fidelio X3: Yes
  2. Weight435 g vs 252 g+73%
Specifications

Side by side

Sony WH-XB910NSony WH-XB910N≈ $2007.2
Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size50 mm40 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency5 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz25,000 Hz
Impedance30 Ω—
Sensitivity100 dB—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—50 h
Charging time—3.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.2
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight435 g252 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare