How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Monitor II A.N.C. vs Fidelio X3

Marshall Monitor II A.N.C. vs Philips Fidelio X3

What Monitor II A.N.C. does better (2) and where Fidelio X3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Monitor II A.N.C.
Marshall · 2020Monitor II A.N.C.
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ $210
Higher score
vs
Philips Fidelio X3
Philips · 2020Fidelio X3
3 advantages≈ $200
6.6Noise control & calls3.8

Why is Monitor II A.N.C. better than Fidelio X3?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · Fidelio X3: No
  2. Weight320 g vs 435 g+36%

Why is Fidelio X3 better than Monitor II A.N.C.?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  3. Driver size40 mm vs 50 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm50 mm
Number of drivers11
Lowest frequency20 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω30 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB100 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones4—
Battery & charging
Battery life45 h—
Battery life with ANC30 h—
Charging time2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)No—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight320 g435 g
Water resistance (IPx)IPx0—
FoldableYes—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare