How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Fidelio TAFA3/10 vs NX-70A

Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10 vs Yamaha NX-70A

What Fidelio TAFA3/10 does better (1) and where NX-70A wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10
Philips · 2026Fidelio TAFA3/10
9.5Score
1 advantage
Higher score
vs
Yamaha NX-70A
Yamaha · 2026NX-70A
1 advantage≈ $2,250
8.7Connectivity5.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fidelio TAFA3/10NX-70A
170 × 303211189 × 333234
Fidelio TAFA3/10NX-70ADifference
Height303 mm333 mm−30 mm
Width170 mm189 mm−19 mm
Depth211 mm234 mm−23 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fidelio TAFA3/10 better than NX-70A?

  1. Lowest frequency40 Hz vs 50 Hz+25%

Why is NX-70A better than Fidelio TAFA3/10?

  1. Output power100 W vs 320 W3.2×
Specifications

Side by side

Yamaha NX-70AYamaha NX-70A≈ $2,250
Sound
Output power100 W320 W
Lowest frequency40 Hz50 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredNoYes
Battery powered (portable)No—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
LE AudioYes—
AuracastYes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Optical inputYesYes
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
AirPlay—Yes
Spotify Connect—Yes
Design & build
Weight3,399 g—
Width170 mm189 mm
Height303 mm333 mm
Depth211 mm234 mm
ColoursBlack—
Features
Remote controlYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare