How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. L/R M vs Fidelio TAFA3/10

Cambridge Audio L/R M vs Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10

What L/R M does better (1) and where Fidelio TAFA3/10 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cambridge Audio L/R M
Cambridge Audio · 2026L/R M
1 advantage≈ $1,500
vs
Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10
Philips · 2026Fidelio TAFA3/10
9.5Score
4 advantages
Higher score
8.8Sound9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

L/R MFidelio TAFA3/10
158 × 263190170 × 303211
L/R MFidelio TAFA3/10Difference
Height263 mm303 mm−40 mm
Width158 mm170 mm−12 mm
Depth190 mm211 mm−21 mm
Weight6,200 g3,399 g+2,801 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is L/R M better than Fidelio TAFA3/10?

  1. Output power150 W vs 100 W+50%

Why is Fidelio TAFA3/10 better than L/R M?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · L/R M: Yes
  2. Weight6,200 g vs 3,399 g+82%
  3. LDACNo · L/R M: Yes
  4. Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+67%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power150 W100 W
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency40 Hz40 Hz
Highest frequency24,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliserYes—
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesNo
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
HDMI eARC / ARCYes—
Optical inputYesYes
Smart & streaming
AirPlayYes—
Design & build
Weight6,200 g3,399 g
Width158 mm170 mm
Height263 mm303 mm
Depth190 mm211 mm
Colours—Black
Features
Remote controlYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare