How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Fidelio TAFA3/10 vs Rockster 2

Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10 vs Teufel Rockster 2

What Fidelio TAFA3/10 does better (4) and where Rockster 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10
Philips · 2026Fidelio TAFA3/10
9.5Score
4 advantages
Higher score
vs
Teufel Rockster 2
Teufel · 2026Rockster 2
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ $1,300
9.7Sound8.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fidelio TAFA3/10Rockster 2
170 × 303211524 × 980595
Fidelio TAFA3/10Rockster 2Difference
Height303 mm980 mm−677 mm
Width170 mm524 mm−354 mm
Depth211 mm595 mm−384 mm
Weight3,399 g43,790 g−40,391 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fidelio TAFA3/10 better than Rockster 2?

  1. Weight3,399 g vs 43,790 g12.9×
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Rockster 2: No
  3. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  4. LDACYes · Rockster 2: No

Why is Rockster 2 better than Fidelio TAFA3/10?

  1. Output power100 W vs 440 W4.4×
  2. Lowest frequency40 Hz vs 36 Hz+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Teufel Rockster 2Teufel Rockster 2≈ $1,3004.8
Sound
Output power100 W440 W
Subwoofer—Built-in
Lowest frequency40 Hz36 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Stereo—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—15 h
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)NoYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE AudioYes—
AuracastYes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Optical inputYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight3,399 g43,790 g
Width170 mm524 mm
Height303 mm980 mm
Depth211 mm595 mm
Protection rating—IPX2
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx2
ColoursBlack—
Features
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
Remote controlYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare